Saturday 1 May 2021

The Politics Behind Political Correctness

Political correctness. It’s a term we hear everywhere around us – on social media sites, in political speeches and debates, and even during everyday conversation. It’s also a term that divides our society into two categories - those who abide by it, and those who scoff at it.

But before you write something off as being “too PC”, ask yourself the following questions: What exactly do I mean when I use the words “political correctness”? Does my understanding of the expression match its actual meaning? What is it about the expression that invites so much contention? And finally, is it important for me, as an individual, to be politically correct today?

First, let’s learn what the term political correctness means, and when and why it came about. According to Britannica, the term first appeared in “Marxist-Leninist vocabulary following the Russian Revolution of 1917”.
Back then, it was used to describe “adherence to the policies and principles of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union”. The phrase was linked to traditionalism, conformity and right-wing ideology.

This continued into the 1960s, when the term was applied by leftists in the USA to mock the right’s extreme orthodoxy. It was not only used to criticise the conservatives, however - the Left also used the term to call out rigidity within their own party. According to Ruth Perry, a professor of literature at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who particip
ated in several feminist and civil rights movements, the expression “was always used as a joke”, when “calling attention to possible dogmatism” within leftist groups.

Until the late 1980s, this expression was used exclusively by the Left. But around 1990, the term was adopted and altered by the Right. 
Conservatives began to claim that political correctness was the Left’s device to promote their curriculum and teaching methods on university and college campuses through “liberal fascism”. For example, during a 1991 commencement speech at the University of Michigan, Republican (right wing) president George H.W. Bush said the following:

"The notion of political correctness has ignited controversy across the land. And although the movement arises from the laudable desire to sweep away the debris of racism and sexism and hatred, it replaces old prejudice with new ones."

Thus, “political correctness”, which came to mean speech that caused the least amount of offence, particularly when speaking of groups who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against, was portrayed in an extremely negative light. Right propaganda stated that political correctness was censorship, and a restriction on freedom of speech. Meanwhile, leftists believed that the Right had villainized the idea of “political correctness”, to get away with hate speech and other similar discrimination.


Recently, movements like MeToo and Black Lives Matter have prompted more anti-political-correctness sentiments, mainly from the people these movements are calling out. One prominent anti-PC crusader is ex-president Donald Trump. Trump, a Republican politician, frequently states that he refuses to be politically correct, as he sees political correctness as yet another conspiracy (just like global warming and the Coronavirus), that neither he nor America has time for. Trump has used this philosophy to account for several outrageous actions, such as referring to Mexicans as rapists, calling women he dislikes “fat pigs” and “disgusting animals”, and openly mocking a victim of sexual assault.


I think this is the essence of why an anti-PC stand is problematic. You can use it to justify any number of statements, and subsequently actions, against victimised groups. I believe that the moment you state that you “don’t believe in political correctness”, you also state that you don’t believe in treating people of persecuted races, religions, classes, genders, and sexual orientations with respect. You state that you are a narrow-minded, bigoted human being.

This translates into our everyday lives, too! For example, every time you use the pronoun “he” instead of “they”, you are erasing people of more than fifty different gender groups. You are indirectly saying that the people who fall into these categories matter less than males. You are becoming another droplet in the bottomless well of misogyny.

One common complaint about political correctness is that it has been taken to an extreme, with “the PC police” correcting you ever time you use a term they deem incorrect. While I agree that we have taken political correctness to an extreme, I also think these extreme measures are necessary. Picture a pendulum that has swung all the way to one end. Before it can return to its equilibrium, it must reach its maximum height on the opposite end. Similarly, women, people of colour, and those in the LGBTQ community have been oppressed for so long that to reach a state of total equality, we must start by taking drastic levels of affirmative action. If at first we make an effort to be overly politically correct in everything we say or do, this common decency will someday become the norm.







32 comments:

  1. Fabulous article Netra !! A topic close to my heart :) - but let your daddy be as he is. Else we will have no colour in our life. We will carry the burden of moving the pendulum - Su aunty

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha, thanks, aunty! I think at this point, my dad's just going out of his way to be politically incorrect, so you don't have to worry about that changing!

      Delete
  2. Well written as always, Netra. I agree with your pov about the pendulum swinging the other way before it finds balance. So far, I have used it in terms of finding the balance between patriarchy and retaliatory extremes. Interesting to read your perspective.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting that you use the same pendulum metaphor to see how to find a balance. I tend to agree with Netra on this one - they we will swing to an extreme before coming to rest in ideal state of equilibrium. And that pendulum of course swings across so many spectrums - patriarchy being one - if dominant - amongst them.

      Delete
    2. Thank you, Manisha Aunty! I think my mum explained my reasoning perfectly here - I've used the pendulum example to show an extreme that will eventually result in equilibrium rather than an immediate equilibrium, which I don't think is tangible after so many years of one extreme.

      Delete
  3. Very well written Netra; did not know about the origins of the term, how it evolved till now!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, and neither did I until I wrote this!

      Delete
  4. I know nothing about politics, but as usual, you've done fab. Keep it up πŸ‘Œ

    ReplyDelete
  5. This article has been an eye- opener to me. Got me thinking whether I am politically correct or no. Brilliantly written with a lot of research going into it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think as long as you're making an effort to be politically correct, you're already on the right track, so don't worry about it! Thanks for the lovely feedback.

      Delete
  6. Great Netra.As usual you have written so well.Sometimes your English goes beyond my head.Congrats.God bless you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much for reading and taking the time to leave a comment!

      Delete
  7. Very interesting and to me - valid - perspective. I completely agree with your pendulum metaphor. What we need in the world today for so many disadvantaged groups / communities - is more than equality. We need to create a state of equity and that will only come from doing more than status quo. So yes, political Correctness is very much the need of the hour - and those who think it’s overrated or over emphasised are those who are closing their eyes to the state of our societies. But it’s great to see your generation thinking deeply about these topics and taking up the good fight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, couldn't have put it better myself! Well, actually I just did, in my article. ;) But anyway, thanks for the feedback!

      Delete
  8. Very well articulated. For the first time I really saw political correctness explained so succinctly. The next question that comes to my mind is whether Political Correctness while it becomes about controlling the expression, is it also resulting in suppression of inconvenient opinion, resulting in what they call these days "the cancel culture". Let's see how the balance is achieved or whether it results in more fissures.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First of all, thank you so much for reading and leaving your feedback! Now, to address your concerns, I don't personally believe that political correctness suppresses opinions at all. You can still share controversial thoughts while being PC - all you have to do is share them in respectful, non-discriminatory language. As for cancel culture (a form of ostracism in which someone is thrust out of social circles), I completely agree that it is wrong, and should not be practised. As long as a person makes an effort to be inclusive, they should be given the chance to make up for instances in which they weren't.

      Delete
  9. Also this kind of research is fantastic and eye opening. I never really thought that ‘political correctness’ would have such a rich, political background and context. Well done on choosing an unusual topic and really thinking about it in a different way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I was shocked to learn the term had so much history behind it, too!

      Delete
  10. Nice 1, I never knew about this. Thank you for clarifying this.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great writing, Netra! Very lucid and compelling argument. πŸ‘πŸ½πŸ‘πŸ½πŸ‘πŸ½
    I agree with you - political correctness is indeed the need of the hour.
    I also think it’s important for us to cultivate the willingness to learn/be flexible, rather than get defensive when someone calls us out on our problematic views.
    At the other end, addressing the ‘cancel culture’ someone else has pointed out in the comments, we need to value progress over perfection - after all, we are all at different points on our journeys, and nobody was born with ‘perfect opinions’.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the kind feedback!
      And yes, I completely agree that it's crucial for us to be willing to change and improve ourselves whenever necessary! However, we must also be sensitive when pointing out flaws in others (something I struggle with continually). This is new to all of us, and we're all still learning, so I definitely wouldn't support cancel culture.

      Delete
  12. Nicely written Nethra. Here is what i'd say:
    1. Be without malice
    2. Have the courage to say what you have to say
    3. Someone somewhere may offend you, grow a thick skin (dont get offended easily) and move on
    4. You may offend someone somewhere,say sorry wasnt your intent and move on
    5. Laugh, often

    Best, Amar (who swings on the same pendulum as your dad, but your dad sometimes goes farther ;-))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for making the effort to read and leave your feedback! I agree with all of those points, though some are easier said than done. :)

      Delete
  13. Well said Netra! Couldn’t agree more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for reading and commenting!

      Delete
  14. Very well Netra. Very informative too. The effort put in by you is evident.

    ReplyDelete
  15. While I 100% agree with the sentiments ... if we were all PC, would the world be a duller place. Hatred has no place in my thinking but being PC for the sake of PC is morally dishonest
    Very well written and argued

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the interesting feedback!
      However, I disagree that the world would be a duller place if we were all PC. On the contrary, it would be friendlier, kinder, and more diverse. I do agree that we shouldn't be PC for the sake of being PC - we should be PC because we genuinely believe it's the right way to behave. This blog was just my way of explaining why being PC is morally correct.

      Delete
  16. Hi Netra - This is by far my favorite! Its so well written. Didn't know where this term really came from - learned something here. Love the last 3 paragraphs - they’re the reason its my favorite. People need to know this and be more conscious and be PC - just how you say it. Keep writing!

    ReplyDelete

Game, Set, Match: Saudi's Sportswashing Success

Image source The deserts of Saudi Arabia have come alive with sports. From its purchase of the Newcastle United football club, to the lau...