Thursday 27 May 2021

The Truth About Israel

 “Tonight I put the kids to sleep in our bedroom,” tweeted Eman Basher, a Palestinian mother of 3 in Gaza on May 14, 2021. “So that when we die, we die together and no one would live to mourn the loss of one another."

Israeli-Palestinian tensions were higher than ever during the past month, with Hamas (a Palestinian militant organisation in Gaza) firing rockets into Israel, and Israel retaliating by repeatedly bombing the Gaza Strip, killing more than 200 civilians. But how did this particular conflict begin? How is it linked to the centuries-long conflict between the states of Israel and Palestine? While a ceasefire has solved the current situation, is there a solution to the broader crisis in the near future? And until such a solution is found, which side of the conflict should you take?

Let’s begin with a complete, truthful and unbiased history of Israel’s creation.

The Beginnings of Zionism

The idea of a “Jewish State” was first established by Theodore Herzl, an Austro-Hungarian Jewish writer, in 1895. Herzl, upon witnessing the public humiliation of Alfred Dreyfus, a Jew artillery officer falsely convicted of treason against the French army, realised that the Jews who were being persecuted across Europe would never truly be safe unless they had a nation of their own. This prompted him to write a 100 page pamphlet titled Der Judenstaat, or “The Jewish State”, which soon became extremely popular among Zionists (those who support the creation and protection of a Jewish nation) in Eastern Europe.

This wasn’t all Herzl did for Zionism, however. Two years after the publication of his pamphlet, he hosted the first World Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland. During this convention, the Zionists created a Jewish National Fund and a land bank to begin buying land in the area in which they hoped to form their state - Palestine. This region had been their home almost two thousand years before, until 70 CE (when the Romans sacked Jerusalem), and they sought to reclaim it. They also started to campaign with various powers for a nation of their own. For the next few decades, the Zionists began migrating to Palestine, which was then under Ottoman rule. The people of Palestine, including Muslims, Christians and Jews, allowed them to settle there without complaint.

World War I

Soon, World War I began, and the Ottomans allied themselves with the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria), and against the Allies (Great Britain, France and Russia). In a bid to win the support of Jews worldwide, British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour released a public statement on November 2nd, 1917, announcing that "His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country." This declaration was a major Zionist victory, and the first step towards making the dream of The Jewish State a reality.

When the Allies defeated the Central Powers, the League of Nations awarded Britain the mandate to rule Palestine. Within this area, Zionists continued to lobby for a nation of their own, while Palestinian Arabs began to feel threatened by the possible usurpation of their home. Zionist migration to Palestine became more systematic, and by 1931, there were 175,000 Jews in Palestine, relative to 760,000 Muslim Arabs. The Jews still comprised less than 33% of Palestine’s population, but their desperation and determination for a homeland meant they were far more skilled, powerful, and wealthy than the surrounding Arabs. In fact, Jewish investments into Palestine were greater than the British budget for the entire region.

Image from bbc.com

World War II

During World War II, the Jews’ need for a country of their own was highlighted by the Holocaust. When the war ended in 1945, Britain was unable to solve the issue, and so it was taken up by the United Nations. Two years later, the UN voted to divide the region into Palestine (an Arab state) and Israel (a Jewish state). It was decided that the Jews would occupy 57% of former Palestine, despite being only 33% of the region’s population. The city of Jerusalem, meanwhile, was to be governed separately by the UN. The Jews, who benefited from the partition, readily agreed to it, and formed the independent state of Israel. The Palestinians, however, were angered by the loss of so much land, and refused to accept the UN’s plan.

Image from bbc.com

Arab-Israeli Wars

Thus, in 1948, when the British withdrew from the region, war broke out. Forces from Egypt, Transjordan (now known as Jordan), Syria, Lebanon and Iraq invaded the area. After almost 10 months of fighting, Israel emerged victorious and the land of Palestine was divided into three main parts, none of which belonged to the Palestinians anymore. Jordan won the West Bank and East Jerusalem, Egypt won Gaza, and Israel controlled all the land that the UN’s partition plan had granted it, as well as a large amount of the land meant for the Palestinians. But despite this triumph, Israel grieved the loss of East Jerusalem, a holy city containing three sacred religious monuments - the Al Aqsa Mosque, the Church of Holy Sepulchre, and most crucial to the Jews, the Wailing Wall. The “country” of Palestine, meanwhile, was fundamentally wiped off the map. As a result, 700,000 Palestinians lost their homes and sought refuge in parts of the West Bank, Gaza and other Arab nations nearby (mainly Jordan). They remembered the day as “al Nakba”, or “The Catastrophe”.

Image from bbc.com

The next significant conflict was the Six-Day War, which began on the 5th of June in 1967. This war, too, was won by the Israelis. When it ended, all of historic Palestine (Palestine before the UN Partition), including Jerusalem, had been annexed by Israel.
Image from bbc.com

The Yom Kipur war was waged between a coalition of Arab states and Israel. This confrontation began on 6th October, 1973, and endedbin a stalemate 18 days later. This was the last of the major Arab-Israeli wars. 

The Oslo Accords

Within what was now Israel, tensions had begun to simmer down. However, this peace was shattered when Israelis began moving to and settling in Israeli-controlled, Palestinian-occupied territory in West Bank and the Gaza Strip. As a result, the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, which aimed to free Palestine from Israeli control, was formed. Unfortunately, despite the PLO’s efforts, Israelis continued to illegally settle in Palestinians’ homes. This led to an intifada, or an uprising, that began in the December of 1987, and ended in September 1993, with the signing of the first Oslo Accords by the PLO, Israel, and the USA. This agreement, while seeming promising at first, soon failed. Subsequently, another set of Oslo Accords (commonly known as Oslo II) were signed in Taba, Egypt in 1995. These Accords divided West Bank into three main sections:

Area A: Under full Palestinian control
Area B: Under joint Israeli and Palestinian control
Area C: Under full Israeli control


This supposed solution, unfortunately, created a new problem. Area C was made up of Israeli settlements scattered across the West Bank, which meant that the Palestinians didn’t have a contiguous piece of land to call their own. Area C also consisted of most of West Bank’s resources, including water and agricultural land. Thus, the Palestinians in West Bank could only secure basic amenities through Israel. These crippling limitations upset the Palestinians, who then staged the second intifada. In retaliation, Israel began building walls around Palestinian territory and restricted transport in and out of the area. What do these enclosed areas remind us of? Ghettos, maybe? The same kind of ghettos that the Jews were forced to live in during the Holocaust? There's some food for thought!

Moving on, in 2005, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip at last. However, it imposed a blockade restricting all movement in and out of the Strip by land, air, or sea. Essentially, the Palestinians in both West Bank and Gaza were at the complete mercy of Israel.

Image from bbc.com

Until recently, this was the situation of Israel and Palestine. Now, it’s time to understand and analyse last month’s clash.

Current Conflict

Palestinians had felt oppressed by Israel for decades, but it all came to a head in the second week of May, when 13 Palestinian families residing in Sheikh Jarrah (a street in East Jerusalem) faced eviction from their homes. This was because of a court case waged by Israeli settlers, who believed they had a right to the land based on an Israeli law that permits Jews to recover property abandoned during the war in 1948. (There is no such law for Palestinians to reclaim land they abandoned, or were forced to leave, during the war.)

Simultaneously, Israeli forces had been restricting Palestinian access to Jerusalem’s Al Aqsa mosque during the holy month of Ramadan. Both these events triggered Palestinian protests, which were then brutally quashed by Israeli police. This violence caused Hamas, the militant organisation that rules Gaza, to fire rockets into Israel from 10th to 18th May. More than 90 percent of these rockets were intercepted by the Iron Dome (an advanced anti-missile shield surrounding Israel), and the ones that weren’t either landed in open fields, or fell short and hit Gaza itself. After the launch of about 4,000 rockets, only 10 Israelis were killed. Meanwhile, Israel, with its superior military power, launched a series of savage air strikes against Gaza, killing approximately 254 people, including 66 children. Israeli police also stormed the Al Aqsa mosque - Islam’s third holiest site - using tear gas and rubber bullets, and injured several innocent worshippers.


Conclusion

Now that a ceasefire has been declared, most of us will forget the issue and go back to lamenting the COVID crisis instead. But before you do that, I implore you to consider what a ceasefire truly means. A ceasefire is merely a temporary suspension of the fighting between Israel and Palestine. A ceasefire does not mean that Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank are free, or even safe. No, they will continue to be colonised, oppressed, and terrorised by Israel. And no one will come to their aid, as Israel is backed by the USA, a powerful country in which Jews control a significant portion of media and finance. Take our own country, for example! Despite preaching peace and tolerance, India is Israel’s largest buyer of arms, and has condemned Hamas’ actions, but not Israel’s. Even wealthy Arab countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar no longer care about Palestine’s plight, as they have their own problems to focus on. At this point in time, it is impossible for the Palestinians to escape their devastating reality.

When we think of Israel, we remember the daring Entebbe raid, the intelligence of the Mossad (Israel’s secret service), and the country’s technological prowess. But look at it from this angle instead. Isn’t Arabs being driven out of their homes eerily similar to the ethnic cleansing of Jews during the Holocaust? 2 million Palestinians permanently blockaded in an 11 kilometre by 40 kilometre strip - what is this if not a Nazi-like ghetto? And what is raining missiles onto trapped civilians in this strip, if not a new kind of gas chamber?

Israelis often remind us of how cruelly they were persecuted during the Holocaust, but today, is what they are doing to the Palestinians any less barbaric?

Friday 14 May 2021

Simple Steps to Being an LGBTQ Ally

Image Source: pexels.com

On September 6th, 2018, the Indian Supreme Court struck down the provision of Section 377 of the IPC (Indian Penal Code) which criminalised same-sex intercourse. While this was a significant victory for India’s LGBTQ community, it is by no means enough. Various forms of discrimination, including but not limited to homophobia*, biphobia*, transphobia* and aphobia*, still run rampant in our country. One simple example of this is the fact that same-sex marriages are not recognised by the state. However, in a democracy like India, the government is just a reflection of our society. So today (May 17th), on International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia, let’s focus on our own shortcomings instead of the nation’s. Let’s learn how we can be allies to the queer community around us.


What’s the first step I should take to be an ally?

The first step to supporting your LGBTQ acquaintances, peers, friends and family is to educate yourself. Even if you don’t personally know a member of the community, it’s important to be familiar with it. Whenever you have a moment to spare, do some research on different genders and sexual orientations. The internet has a boundless collection of resources that explain the spectrum of identities within the LGBTQ society through essays, videos and even memes! To save you the time, here is a handy compilation of politically correct terms for various groups of the LGBTQ population:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/06/15/lgbtq-glossary-slang-ally-learn-language/101200092/

What else can I do to help as an ally?

Here are some simple actions you can take to help the queer community:

Make an effort to use respectful language when speaking of this community.
Similarly, do not stay silent when someone else speaks of, or to, them in a derogatory manner.
If you are a straight, cis*, person, check your privilege so you can sympathise with those who do not have the same benefits.
When meeting someone for the first time, do not assume which gender they are, or what their romantic or sexual preference is - wait for them to tell you who they are.
If you are called out on problematic behaviour, do not get defensive. Instead, apologise, correct yourself, and move on from the incident.

How should I react if a queer friend comes out to me?

As a straight, allo*, cis female, I have an extremely limited perspective. So to answer this question, I asked my biromantic* friend - let’s call her Alex - to share what she believes is an ideal response to this kind of confession.

“The best reaction would be ‘okay, that’s cool’,” Alex muses, “because that shows they’re automatically accepting.”

Therefore, if a friend comes out to you as gay, bisexual, asexual, aromatic and/or transgender, don’t create much ado about it. Just make it clear that you recognise who they are, and are willing to provide a listening ear and a helping hand. Remember, your friend has shown respect, trust and affection by disclosing their identity to you. It is your duty to be worthy of these sentiments.

How should I react if my child comes out as queer?

If your child comes out as a member of the LGBTQ family, your responsibility, and subsequently anxiety, for their happiness is far greater than that of a friend. So to help you navigate this daunting experience, here are some major do’s and dont’s.

First of all, make sure your child knows that you are there for them, and will assist them on their journey. For example, tell your child, “I understand, and accept you for who you are”, or “I don’t understand completely, but I will make an effort to do so”.

Phrases like “it’s just a phase” and “you’ll grow out of it”, meanwhile, are absolute faux pas, as they completely invalidate your child’s sense of self.

It should be clear to you that this is your child’s identity, and it isn’t going to change anytime soon. “And even if it does change,” says Alex, “it’s not an ‘I told you so’ moment.”

Welcome your child’s new identity, as they feel safe, comfortable and content within it. If, some time down the line, they decide to change it, understand and accept that, too.

How can I, as a parent, be an ally as well?

As a child, I think the main mistake parents make when it comes to the queer community is sheltering their kids from it.

While most heterosexual couples are happy to let their little girls read stories about Prince Charming saving the day, they rarely ever expose them to stories about two women falling in love. Sure, this may be due to a lack of lesbian representation in the media, but it’s also because of the ingrained fear of “the other” in their minds.

Here’s an example of why this fear is not only foolish, but dangerous as well:

Aryan and Anita are an ordinary Indian couple with a baby boy named Avi. When Avi turns ten, they explain romance and relationships to him. They tell him that someday, he might fall in love with a woman, marry her, and start a family of his own. Avi listens disinterestedly, and soon returns to his model train set.

Then, a few weeks later, he comes across the word “bisexual” on social media. When he asks his parents what it means, they hush him, saying that he’s “too young” to understand it. His impressionable mind now forms negative connotations around the word. When he finally learns about homosexuality from his mates at school, he’s taught to joke about it, to jeer at it, to call his enemies “gay” as an insult.

Avi grows up, and marries a woman equally as bland as his mother. Soon, she gives birth to a girl. When this girl turns nine, she asks Avi what the word “lesbian” means. And Avi replies, “Don’t worry about that word, you’re far too young to understand it anyway.”

If your kid is old enough to learn about heterosexual relationships, they’re old enough to learn about the various diverse relationships that fall into the LGBTQ category, too. Don’t teach your child that a relationship is a romantic connection between a man and woman. Teach them that a relationship is a healthy, loving, romantic bond between any individuals.

Break the vicious cycle of heteronormativity*.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Being an ally isn’t difficult at all. Even small measures, like choosing to watch shows with queer representation, or speaking up when someone close to you makes a transphobic remark, show that you care. “At the end of the day,” says Alex, “all it takes is education and acceptance.”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Glossary

Homophobia – Dislike of homosexual people

Biphobia – Dislike of bisexual people

Transphobia – Dislike of transgender people

Aphobia – Dislike of people on the asexual and aromantic spectrums

Cis –  Cisgender; a person whose sense of personal identity and gender corresponds with their birth sex

Allo – Alloromatic; feeling romantic attraction

Allosexual; feeling sexual attraction

Biromantic – Feeling romantic attraction to both men and women

Heteronormativity – The belief that heterosexuality is the ‘normal’ mode of sexual orientation


Saturday 1 May 2021

The Politics Behind Political Correctness

Political correctness. It’s a term we hear everywhere around us – on social media sites, in political speeches and debates, and even during everyday conversation. It’s also a term that divides our society into two categories - those who abide by it, and those who scoff at it.

But before you write something off as being “too PC”, ask yourself the following questions: What exactly do I mean when I use the words “political correctness”? Does my understanding of the expression match its actual meaning? What is it about the expression that invites so much contention? And finally, is it important for me, as an individual, to be politically correct today?

First, let’s learn what the term political correctness means, and when and why it came about. According to Britannica, the term first appeared in “Marxist-Leninist vocabulary following the Russian Revolution of 1917”.
Back then, it was used to describe “adherence to the policies and principles of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union”. The phrase was linked to traditionalism, conformity and right-wing ideology.

This continued into the 1960s, when the term was applied by leftists in the USA to mock the right’s extreme orthodoxy. It was not only used to criticise the conservatives, however - the Left also used the term to call out rigidity within their own party. According to Ruth Perry, a professor of literature at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who particip
ated in several feminist and civil rights movements, the expression “was always used as a joke”, when “calling attention to possible dogmatism” within leftist groups.

Until the late 1980s, this expression was used exclusively by the Left. But around 1990, the term was adopted and altered by the Right. 
Conservatives began to claim that political correctness was the Left’s device to promote their curriculum and teaching methods on university and college campuses through “liberal fascism”. For example, during a 1991 commencement speech at the University of Michigan, Republican (right wing) president George H.W. Bush said the following:

"The notion of political correctness has ignited controversy across the land. And although the movement arises from the laudable desire to sweep away the debris of racism and sexism and hatred, it replaces old prejudice with new ones."

Thus, “political correctness”, which came to mean speech that caused the least amount of offence, particularly when speaking of groups who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against, was portrayed in an extremely negative light. Right propaganda stated that political correctness was censorship, and a restriction on freedom of speech. Meanwhile, leftists believed that the Right had villainized the idea of “political correctness”, to get away with hate speech and other similar discrimination.


Recently, movements like MeToo and Black Lives Matter have prompted more anti-political-correctness sentiments, mainly from the people these movements are calling out. One prominent anti-PC crusader is ex-president Donald Trump. Trump, a Republican politician, frequently states that he refuses to be politically correct, as he sees political correctness as yet another conspiracy (just like global warming and the Coronavirus), that neither he nor America has time for. Trump has used this philosophy to account for several outrageous actions, such as referring to Mexicans as rapists, calling women he dislikes “fat pigs” and “disgusting animals”, and openly mocking a victim of sexual assault.


I think this is the essence of why an anti-PC stand is problematic. You can use it to justify any number of statements, and subsequently actions, against victimised groups. I believe that the moment you state that you “don’t believe in political correctness”, you also state that you don’t believe in treating people of persecuted races, religions, classes, genders, and sexual orientations with respect. You state that you are a narrow-minded, bigoted human being.

This translates into our everyday lives, too! For example, every time you use the pronoun “he” instead of “they”, you are erasing people of more than fifty different gender groups. You are indirectly saying that the people who fall into these categories matter less than males. You are becoming another droplet in the bottomless well of misogyny.

One common complaint about political correctness is that it has been taken to an extreme, with “the PC police” correcting you ever time you use a term they deem incorrect. While I agree that we have taken political correctness to an extreme, I also think these extreme measures are necessary. Picture a pendulum that has swung all the way to one end. Before it can return to its equilibrium, it must reach its maximum height on the opposite end. Similarly, women, people of colour, and those in the LGBTQ community have been oppressed for so long that to reach a state of total equality, we must start by taking drastic levels of affirmative action. If at first we make an effort to be overly politically correct in everything we say or do, this common decency will someday become the norm.







Game, Set, Match: Saudi's Sportswashing Success

Image source The deserts of Saudi Arabia have come alive with sports. From its purchase of the Newcastle United football club, to the lau...