Sunday 25 November 2018

My View on the Sabarimala Controversy


Image source: http://mattersindia.com/2018/10/sabarimala-all-one-needs-to-know/


Sabarimala is a temple for the worship of Lord Ayyappa. It has been visited by pilgrims for more than nine decades and is now one of the most controversial topics in the news.

 For a very long time [maybe even since the temple was built], women between the ages of 10 to 50 did not enter the temple. This is what most people think. However, it is partially incorrect. There was an informal ban on women entering the temple but it wasn’t always strictly followed. There are records of the Queen of Travancore entering the temple in 1939 when she was around that age, and many more such records of women of this age entering during important festivals. This proves that the ‘ancient traditions that must be upheld’ aren’t that ancient after all. It was only around the 1970s that women were really banned and now people are using this tradition as yet another excuse to put down women.

The next point I must make is related to the argument most people I speak to about this use: It’s a tradition, and breaking it is offensive to Hinduism. Just because something is a tradition, it doesn’t necessarily have to persist. Not every tradition is right. For example, untouchability. This was a huge part of Hinduism, but now it has been forbidden, according to the Right to Equality in our Constitution. There is one story about an ‘untouchable’, which I think is very relevant to our topic.

Image source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanaka_Dasa


When the Udipi Krishna temple was first built, Saint Madhvacharya had originally installed the Govinda idol facing east, as was the custom. Kanakadasa, an ardent devotee of Lord Krishna, visited the temple. However, as he was from a low caste, he wasn’t allowed to enter from the main eastern entrance. Kanakadasa ran to the western side of the temple and pressed his eyes against the holes in the wall, begging Krishna to appear before him. The idol of Krishna, impressed by his loyalty and dedication, slowly turned to face him. Thus, Kanakadasa was able to see Udipi Krishna.
The reason I have written this story out for you is that I feel that history is repeating itself. A few decades ago, we didn’t allow Dalits into our temples. Now, aren’t we discriminating against women in the same way?

While women around the world are fighting for equality, I find it surprising that we women ourselves are protesting against our own right to enter temples. Take the time when Trupti Desai tried to enter Sabarimala for example. Hundreds of people blocked her at the airport – and who were most of these people? Women.

However accomplished we imagine ourselves to be, we are still close-minded and backward in our thinking if we deny simple rights like these to equal human beings.

I do not mean to offend in any way by writing this blog. I’m only expressing my opinions on the subject and hoping that perhaps a few readers will rethink their stance and maybe even agree with me. Thank you.

20 comments:

  1. I love that you are venturing into controversial and mature subjects. Kudos to you for the research done . I am one of the most ardent supporters of gender equality . I object to any discrimination on the basis of caste gender race etc. but having said that , I would not break a rule for the sake of proving a point. So the likes of Trupti Desai who may or may not believe in lord ayyappa , making a hue and cry, makes me a’doubter’!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for reading my blog and showing me your viewpoint. I think that though Trupti Desai might be doing this to cause trouble and not because she believes in Lord Ayyappa, maybe what she’s doing is right. After all, she is fighting for equality and many women support her in this. Also, I only mentioned Trupti Desai because I thought it was strange that women themselves are against their right to enter Sabarimala, not because I support her.

      Delete
  2. A very thought provoking and well researched piece. Got me thinking as well. Maybe change my mind?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very well researched and put down. But again, people fighting against a perspective or point of view, irrespective of whether they truly believe in it or not,just to be different, is attention seeking. One should not rebel, for the sake of rebelling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for reading and giving me feedback. However, no one is really rebelling just for attention. People are fighting against this because they think it is discriminatory and unfair to women, which I strongly feel it is.

      Delete
    2. love all your responses as much as i love your writing, Netra!

      Delete
  4. Very well researched and put down. But again, people fighting against a perspective or point of view, irrespective of whether they truly believe in it or not,just to be different, is attention seeking. One should not rebel, for the sake of rebelling.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well expressed article. It would be interesting to get a factual sense of who owns the temple - is it a private property - and hence they can do what they want? Also - how do other religions compare on similar practices - are there for example restrictions on entry of women into Mosques, Churches, Synagogues...? Are there any challenges there and how have they been dealt with..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The temple is owned by Travancore Devaswom Board, and religious matters are managed by the Thazhamon Madom family, the priests of Sabarimala. However, the main issue is not about who has the right to decide who can enter. My question is, why do they discriminate against women by not allowing them in in the first place??? As for most other religious sites,no, there are no such incidents where women have been given unequal treatment.

      Delete
  6. You have missed the point completely . It is not a question of gender equality , if is simply a question of religious practices being subjected to unnecessary judicial review by certain activists , same is not done for other religions in India . There are temples that do not allow men . So isn’t that discriminatory ? Religion and faith are not based on legal precepts , and cannot be interpreted as such .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for reading this blog and taking the time to give me feedback.
      However, I don’t think I’m the one who has missed the point here. My blog is not about whether the judiciary can decide on these matters or not. All I want to ask is why any place should discriminate against women in this way.
      As for Temples that do not allow men in, I do not think that is right either. In this blog, though, I am focusing on Sabarimala. Thank you.

      Delete
  7. Hi Nethra - thought the post was well drafted and well researched. Liked how you compare it to the old ban on Dalits not allowed to enter temples. I also liked how you brought it out that the ban on women in Sabarimala (now 'removed') is a recent 'tradition'. The last was a new perspective for me. Keep writing, Bravo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Sajit Uncle. Thank you so much for the feedback. I will continue to write and I hope that you will enjoy the upcoming blogs!

      Delete
  8. Hi Netra...very well researched and well articulated piece. I am so glad that young generation is waking up to the need of the hour. Tripti Desai may or may not be interested to enter Sabarimala temple but just ensuring gender equality in our country which was overdue. In our male dominated society they make all the rules, so now it is time to show that women are not 2nd class citizen anymore. Keep writing..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Durga Aunty. Thank you for reading and leaving your encouraging feedback!

      Delete
  9. A bold choice for a blog. While I fully agree that women are being discriminated in our country, I fail to understand the need for making the sabarimala issue such a large scale one. We need to ensure that a woman can walk safely on the street even during the night. Is there a place in India that offers this comfort for women? The energy spent by one and all in the sabarimala issue could have been vented in fighting for safety for women. Singapore, gulf countries ensure that. Why can't India?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the encouraging and open minded feedback. What I would like to explain is, many pennies make a pound. Each time we make rules and bans against women like this, we are unknowingly contributing to large scale discrimination against women. The reason that a woman cannot walk safely on a street at night is that we educated people are discriminating against women without even realising it. What do we expect uneducated people to do then?

      Delete
  10. This is an excellent point that you make. Each time we discrimate against a woman, we contribute to larger issues around power and control and the supposed superiority of one gender. And it all adds up doesn’t it - making it that much unsafe for a woman to walk the street alone?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Very well written. Reasoned analysis of a complex issues. Keep writing! Nilanjan

    ReplyDelete

The New Struggle Against Slavery

Image source In 1981, Mauritania became the last country in the world to abolish slavery. The decree signified a global end to slavery —...