An image of the Nagurskoye airbase sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagurskoye_(air_base)
In the fifth month of 2021, the Russian military aircraft Ilyushin II-76 landed for the very first time on the Frank Josef Land archipelago in the midst of the Arctic Ocean. The plane came to rest at Nagurskoye - the Russian army’s northernmost base - carrying 80 people, as well as 3 tons of equipment required for further construction on the airbase. During the Cold War, Nagurskoye consisted only of a runway, a weather station and a communications outpost. But according to AP News, it is now “bristling with missiles and radar” and an “extended runway can handle all types of aircraft, including nuclear-capable strategic bombers”. What could the purpose of these recent developments be? Is it simply Russia’s way of flexing its political muscle, or something far more sinister? What is going on in the Arctic? Let’s find out.
First of all, how exactly do we define the Arctic? As established by most geologists, the Arctic is the area between Arctic Circle, a major latitude that is 66.5 degrees north of the Equator, and the North Pole, which is situated a whole 90 degrees above the Equator. The region consists mainly of liquid saltwater, with most of its freshwater frozen in the form of glaciers and icebergs.
A map of the Arctic and surrounding nations sourced from https://geology.com/world/arctic-ocean-map.shtml
Unlike Antarctica, which covers roughly the same area as the Arctic, the latter region is inhabited. Yes, it's true! The Arctic is in fact home to four million people, including one million indigenous people divided into over 40 different ethnic groups. The majority of this indigenous population lives within the borders of a country and therefore falls under its administration, although some groups - like the Inuit of Canada - are fighting for their right to self-government.
The Arctic is surrounded by eight countries, each owning a small slice of it: Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, USA, and, of course, Russia. The governments of these countries, together with representatives of the Arctic’s indigenous population, form the Arctic Council. Established on 19 September 1996 upon the signing of the Ottawa Declaration, this body helps maintain peace in the Arctic by promoting "cooperation, coordination and interaction" among its members. It plays a major role in sustainable development and environmental protection in the region. Most of its work is, however, research-based, as the Council refuses to "enforce its guidelines, assessments or recommendations." The chairmanship of the Arctic Council rotates every two years among the Arctic States, the current chairman being none other than the Russian Federation. But while this Council keeps peace in the Arctic, it does not own the entirety of it. So who does?
The simple answer is nobody. The eight nations surrounding the Arctic Ocean merely own strips of land on its coastline and can, according to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, exploit resources from the seabed upto 370 kilometres off their shorelines. The Arctic Ocean itself, though, being an (albeit mostly frozen) ocean, has no owner. But is this about to change?
Due to climate change, the blanket of ice covering the Arctic Ocean has begun to melt rapidly. According to Richard Powell, a polar geographer at the Scott Polar Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, the Arctic will be ice-free by “around 2040 or 2050”. As the ice melts, it leaves behind it an estimated 13% of the world's undiscovered oil and 30% of its undiscovered natural gas, which have long been buried under the frozen surface. The demand for such resources, while lessened since the introduction of renewable sources of energy, is still exceptionally high. Therefore, countries like Russia and the USA are likely to compete for dominance over this well of untapped resources. This brings us to Russia’s latest move.
Russia’s expanding its military base closest to the Arctic has aroused suspicion that the country plans to make a grab for the resource-rich region. “We have concerns about some of the recent military activities in the Arctic that increases the dangers of accidents and miscalculations and undermines the shared goal of a peaceful and sustainable future for the region,” stated USA Secretary of State Antony Blinken. As of now, the Russian Federation has only militarised its own territory. Will it dare to invoke the Arctic Coucil's wrath by venturing further? On one hand, it is clear that countries like the USA will not take any such attempt of Russia's lying down. On the other, the Arctic Council’s mandate explicitly excluding military security would enable Russia to carry out such a scheme without its intervention.
If the Russian government were to get its hands on unclaimed Arctic terrain, it would most likely result in what several ironically refer to as the "new Cold War".
Didn't know anything about Arctic till I read Netra s blog
ReplyDeleteAs usual she has done lot of research and collected so much information it is really worth reading this blog and know what is happening to this northern most continent
Thank you very much! To be honest, I knew hardly anything about the Arctic before I began writing this blog, either!
DeleteBrilliant Netra.I was not aware of this in such a detailed fashion.Congrats.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the feedback! I'm glad you learnt something from my work.
DeleteNetra: You are gifted with a unique ability to express facts on sensitive topics in a humble and succinct manner. Every time I read your blog, I learn a lot on the topic you are writing about, the beautiful manner in wich you write, and the succinct nature of your writing.
ReplyDeleteJust wonderful. Please keep your blogs coming.
Thank you so much, Uncle Kapil! It's great to hear you've learnt something new from my articles.
DeleteNetra, this could easily be the plot for the next Archer thriller. Extremely informative. Kudos, once again!
ReplyDeleteThank you. I have heard of Archer's Matter of Honour about Alaska - the USA's main link to the Arctic region - and its plot does actually have some interesting similarities to today's conflict!
DeleteBut wouldn't we all be doomed by the time we reach these resources? It's literally a fight to the bottom of the ocean. Keep 'em coming!
ReplyDeleteAs far as I know, that is plausible - the Arctic melting would likely cause several natural disasters, which would in turn greatly endanger the population of the eight Arctic States. So yes, "a fight to the bottom of the ocean" sounds like a pretty accurate summary of the conflict!
DeleteAs mentioned by others had no clue about it .. grt work... Very well explained. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot for the kind compliments!
DeleteAwesome Netra for doing so much of study and then penning down your thoughts. Very interesting read and a departure from geological issues that you keep reading where India is directly involved. Keep up the good work
ReplyDeleteThank you very much for your encouraging feedback!
DeleteHere's a fun fact, though: India became involved in the Arctic, too, when we founded our first permanent Arctic research station in 2008. You can read more about the Himadri Arctic Research Station here: https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/himadri-station-india/
Illuminating and interesting, Netra!
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed reading it and certainly waiting for your next blog!
Thank you, Lathika Atthai!
DeleteWell written Netra. Your content is very unique. 👌
ReplyDeleteKeep writing!
Thanks a lot for the compliments!
DeleteInformative and interesting as always. You say majority of the population belong to these countries. This makes me wonder "what about the rest?". Can you please throw some light on that Netra?
ReplyDeleteHello Captain Venkat! Thank you for the kind words.
DeleteThe Arctic's total population, as per the AHDR's (Arctic Human Development Report) definition of the region, comprises four million people. Within this is the indigenous population, or the one million people whose ancestors inhabited the region pre-colonization. Today, most of these indigenous people identify as citizens of one of the eight Arctic States.
There are some exceptions, however. One example is the over 100,000 Sámi people who live in Sápmi, an area that stretches across the northern parts of Finland, Russia, Norway and Sweden. These people have traditionally turned to reindeer herding, fishing, livestock farming, and hunting for their livelihoods. Since 1989, the Sámi in Norway have had their own elected assembly, or the Sámediggi. The Sámi aim to attain recognition for themselves as a nation.
For more information on the indigenous population of the Arctic, check out: https://www.arcticcentre.org/EN/arcticregion/Arctic-Indigenous-Peoples
For more information on the Sámi, check out: https://arctic-council.org/about/permanent-participants/saami-council/
Thanks a lot Netra. You have summarized it very well. I keep learning a lot from you.
DeleteNicely written Netra. Very very informative.
ReplyDeleteThank you, I'm glad you found it useful!
DeleteI was totally clueless regarding this. Always assumed that the Artic was a big mass of ice.keep these informations coming Netra!
ReplyDeleteHaha, I think several make that assumption, which is why I decided to shed some light on the topic! Glad you enjoyed it.
DeleteI feel smarter after reading that; learned many new things today! This piece would not be out of place in the National Geographic or the Economist! Bravo!
ReplyDeleteWow, thank you very much for your kind compliments!
DeleteThis is super informative Netra. So many new facts for me, like 4Mn inhabitants!! Keep them coming..
ReplyDeleteThank you for the feedback! I'm glad you learnt something new from the article.
DeleteNetra, I'm curious about what got you to research this topic?
ReplyDeleteI usually find ideas for my blog from newspaper articles or topics I see trending online. I think this one came from a discussion with one of my parents!
DeleteVery informative and excellent article - kudos to You Netra !!! Keep up the good work
ReplyDeleteVery impressive and well written article netra.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to read more
Thank you very much! You should read this piece I just wrote, too: http://netqueenblogs.blogspot.com/2021/10/prompt-writing-virus-was-born-in-wuhan.html
Deletevery informative !! didnt know of the region nor the happenings there!!
ReplyDeleteThanks, it's great to hear you learnt something new from my article!
DeleteSuper informative and very well researched Netra, as others have mentioned, I had no idea about the details of this region!
ReplyDeleteYour precocious understanding of geo political issues and the interesting manner of weaving the facts together into a compelling narrative, just amaze me!
Keep them coming Netra, so proud of you!
Thank you, Shobana Aunty! I'm so glad you enjoyed my writing. Please read this piece I've just written about the pandemic: http://netqueenblogs.blogspot.com/2021/10/prompt-writing-virus-was-born-in-wuhan.html
DeleteI think you'll enjoy it!
The blog was super informative. Lots of things I was not aware of and learnt. Great research and well written!
ReplyDeleteThank you for the encouraging feedback!
DeleteGreat read Netra! Very articulate and informative. Didn't know any of these facts related to the Arctic. Thanks for the blog.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your kind comment!
DeleteInteresting topic - question I always had - is it possible for ships to navigate from Europe to the Western coast of the United States via the Arctic? Wouldn’t that be shorter than the Atlantic Ocean and Panama Canal route?
ReplyDeleteA well researched and well written article Netra!
ReplyDeleteHi there! Thanks for the interesting question.
ReplyDeleteAs of today, it is nearly impossible for ships to navigate through the Arctic, as most of the ocean is covered with impenetrable ice. However, with climate change melting this ice, it is likely that we can begin creating shipping routes in the region in a few decades' time. You can read more about this possibility here: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45527531