Image courtesy: http://www.indiaheritagedesk.com/event/music-dance-rashmirathi-a-story-of-karna/
Karna, a key character in the Mahabharata (a well-known
Indian epic), is a tragic hero with a unique story. He faced many difficult
decisions, and people have differing opinions on whether what he did was right
or wrong. Here is a short summary of his story, and what I think about it.
Karna was a charioteer’s son and his family was very poor.
Despite this, Karna was very skilled in archery. One day, an archery contest was
held by the royal family of Hastinapur in celebration of the Pandavas and
Kauravas (princes and heirs to the throne) completing their training under
their teacher, Guru Drona. Karna knew he had a chance of winning and entered
the contest, in which Arjuna impressed the onlookers by shooting blindfolded,
and creating fire and rain with arrows. Drona remarked that none of the
participants could match Arjuna in archery. Then, Karna stood up and did
everything that Arjuna had just done, equally well. Drona, astonished that
somebody was as proficient in archery as Arjuna, asked Karna to compete against
Arjuna and prove how dextrous he really was. That was when Karna’s father,
pleased that his son could match the gifted Arjuna, rushed out of the crowd to
congratulate Karna and hug him.
There was an uproar when people realised that Karna was a
charioteer’s son, and he was immediately disqualified because of his caste. It
was then that Duryodhana stepped forward and announced that this was unfair.
Duryodhana was the oldest Kaurava and hated the Pandavas as the oldest Pandava,
Yudhishtra was the heir to the Hastinapur throne. He always tried to bring
about their downfall with his cunning plans. However, he thought that Karna
being discriminated against was unfair as Karna was as capable as Arjuna was.
So, feeling bad for Karna, Duryodhana made him the King of Anga so he too could
compete in this contest for royalty. Karna felt grateful to Duryodhana and soon
became his closest friend.
Many years later, the Kauravas, who wanted Hastinapur for
themselves, waged war against the Pandavas, the rightful heirs to the throne.
This was also when Karna realised that he was the oldest Pandava brother. He
had, in effect, been abandoned at birth and adopted by a charioteer. So, why
did he fight on Duryodhana’s side, against his own brothers who were on the
side of righteousness?
There are many opinions on this. Karna had to choose between
two important things – being righteous (Dharma) and being a true friend.
Personally, I think Karna did the right thing. Duryodhana was a true friend –
he helped Karna during his time of trouble – and I feel that Karna was right to
repay his kindness in this manner even if it meant fighting for the wrong
cause.
Let’s continue with the story.
The war went on for many days. Karna decided to confront
Arjuna, whose charioteer was none other than Lord Krishna himself. When Karna’s
chariot got stuck in the mud, his charioteer Shalya refused to alight from the
chariot and lift the wheel out. So, Karna had to step down and try to free the
wheel. At that moment, when Karna was completely defenceless, Krishna ordered
Arjuna to shoot and kill Karna. That is how Karna died.
Why was he killed in such an unfair way when it was a rule
in warfare to never assault an unarmed warrior? Here is Krishna’s explanation
of this incident – so many times, when Duryodhana was unjust (like when his
army assaulted an unarmed and lone Abhimanyu), did Karna try to stop him? No.
Karna always supported Duryodhana, even when he knew that Duryodhana was wrong
and unjust. And hence, Karna deserved everything that happened to him.
But I say – wasn’t Karna just doing his duty as a friend –
fulfilling his Dharma as a friend? Karna was a true friend – come what may, he
was always loyal to Duryodhana. Maybe he gave his loyalty wrongly, but he knew
that he owed Duryodhana for his kindness and so he fought on Duryodhana’s side
throughout.
And wasn’t what Krishna did also unfair? Was what happened
to Karna really fair? Was it righteous
Whatever the answer to these questions, Karna is now
considered a great tragic hero and his is one of the greatest stories of
friendship. When he was given a choice between being a true friend and
following the path of righteousness, he chose being a true friend. What would
you choose?
Worth pondering over Netra! Your article has given some food for thought to my brains
ReplyDeleteBrilliant.
ReplyDeleteDifferent way of looking at the story.
Very unique.
Well done Netra
Netra, a real eye opener - great question & great insights. Your blog also makes me want to read Mahabharata!!
ReplyDeleteNetra very well written
ReplyDeleteYou have asked a time honoured difficult question
There is no black and white answer
Dharmasankata
Netra,
ReplyDeleteThat is a very interesting topic you have chosen. I think Karna made the right choice. He could have been and was killed by unfair means alone. When the entire society ridiculed him, Duryodhana bailed him out. So it was fair enough that he stood by his side. By the way, the greatest warriors in mythology always knew that they were going to die in that epic battle. And that makes them more popular. Achilles was one of that kind.
Good one Netra. Awaiting your next one.
-Venkat.
Just superb. Keep it up. Chetan Shah
ReplyDeleteA different perspective to "friendship" and so much to ponder over...well done Netra!
ReplyDeleteThank you for enlightening me with Karna’s friendship story Netra!
ReplyDelete